1. The plaintiff A's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant is the plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, T, U, V, W, X.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 25, 2004, the development plan was approved because the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government ADAE, AF Day 3,492,421㎡ was designated as a AG urban development zone under the Urban Development Act (hereinafter “instant development zone,” and “instant development project”), and the Defendant was designated as the developer of the instant development project.

On January 15, 2004, the date of announcement for public inspection of residents to designate the development zone of this case as an urban development zone is January 15, 2004.

B. Accordingly, on October 19, 2004, the Defendant publicly announced the relocation measures concerning the development project of this case on November 20, 2002, which is the base date for relocation measures (Provided, That in the case of tenants, August 20, 2002, which is three months before the base date).

C. The defendant is prior to the amendment by Act No. 8665 of October 17, 2007, as stated below by each district of the development zone of this case.

A. The former Public Works Act (hereinafter “former Public Works Act”)

(1) On October 18, 2007, the date of the public announcement of the district compensation plan, and other relevant statutes, the compensation plan was publicly announced. On June 24, 2004, on March 29, 2005, the AJ District AK on February 15, 2006, the AL 152,813С among the AK District on February 30, 2005, is incorporated into a project district by AM as of October 18, 2007, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Public Notification. The Defendant is incorporated into the development zone in this case. The Defendant is written in the column of “seller” in attached Table 3, including the Plaintiff B, whose living base was lost due to the expropriation of the house or land, etc. of the instant development zone, and as of October 18, 2007.

As part of the relocation measures under the former Public Works Act, apartment buildings to be developed within the development district of this case to the buyers of this case (hereinafter “instant apartment buildings”) by implementing the development project of this case.

I decided to specially supply B.

The sale price for the above special supply is the same as the sale price for the apartment sold to the general public, in other words, as in the case of general supply.