1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On October 25, 2008, while serving as a taxi driver for business purposes, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as “the catus catus catus catus catus catus catus catus (4 and 5 catum), blood satis, satise, trife nuclear escape certificate (4 and 5 cat), catum catus, left-hand catum catum damage, left-hand catum damage, left-hand catum damage, and left-hand catum catus” due to the accident of conflict without discovering the string vehicle that was going behind while changing the string from the taxi platform of the bus terminal (hereinafter “instant accident”), and completed medical treatment by October 31, 2013 after receiving the Defendant’s medical care approval.

B. On November 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to the Plaintiff as Grade VI [Class VII 5] (Class VII 5), a person with minor functional disorder in spine in spine (Class VII 7) and at the same time, there are remaining disabilities in spine in spine (Class VII 7), a person with significant changes in spine in the Do (Class VIII 8), a person with significant changes in the dunese (Class II 8), and a person with remaining parts of the part in the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the Han arms (a part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the building).]

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 3-1, and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion constitutes subparagraph 6 of class 8 of the disability grade because the scope of exerciseable scope of the left shoulder section due to the instant accident is limited to not less than 120∑ 3/4, and is limited to not less than 3/4, and thus, the instant disposition based on the premise that the disability grade in this part is class 10 is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. Determination 1: (a) The Plaintiff’s king-Jin-gun Plaintiff was on October 8, 1986, and completely used one arms on the part of the king-Jin-gun (“damage”) caused by traffic accidents.