A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 01:25 on May 17, 2017; (b) 01:25, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol from the Victim C’s D’s Operation D subparagraph B, took a bath on the tables with two other customers, without any justifiable reason; and (c) obstructed the victim’s main shop business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as food and alcohol, which is 30 minutes, at the right angle.

2. On May 17, 2017, at around 01:25, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the table tamp at the above main station, a 10,000 won of the market price, which was the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, even though they were punished several times as crimes such as interference with duties, damage to property, assault, etc.), but the liability for the crime in this case is not easy in that they

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;