Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 300,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

"2018 High 450"

1. On December 10, 2017, Defendant A: (a) at the “D’s entertainment shop located in Stitu City C around 02:35 on December 10, 2017; and (b) at the “D’ entertainment shop located in Stitu City C; (c) on the ground that, while working and drinking, a person does not take a part in his/her singing and doing so, he/she would feel bad; and (d) on the ground that he/she does not take part in his/her singing, he/she sawd and she would be bad; and (e) on the other hand, she obstructed the victim’s entertainment shop

2. The Defendant A destroyed the property by means of a shotble, citing the victim B’s shotble at the time and place described in paragraph 1, and thereby damaging the property and impairing its utility.

"2018 High 451"

1. On January 13, 2017, the Defendant interfered with Defendant A’s duties, by force, obstructed the victim’s main store business by avoiding disturbance between about 20 minutes, and allowing customers to feel uneasy, and leaving the place. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s main store business by force.

2. The defendant Eul's assault shall be discarded to the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1, and the victim A shall be discarded to the victim's death.

"Influoring the horses of "," the beer spreaded the beer to the face of the victim A, and breathed the beer face, and assaulted the beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements “2018 High 450”

1. B written statements;

1. "2018 Go fixed 451" of the field photographs of the case;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV filmings;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision pertaining to the facts constituting a crime: Articles 314(1)(Interference with Business) and 366(Destruction of Property) of the Criminal Act (Selection of fines) Defendant B: Article 260(1) (Selection of penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (the Defendants)

1. Defendant A with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A): The same criminal records are two times, and the victim is repeated.