All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. According to the evidence of the prosecutor (fact-finding), the court below erred in finding the Defendant not guilty of this part of the charges due to misunderstanding of facts, even though the Defendant acknowledged the fact that he damaged 5-person LG TV monitors, such as 5-person LG TV monitors, as indicated in the facts charged.

B. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the facts charged, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine that found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On August 14, 2015, the gist of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 02:09 on August 14, 2015, the Defendant made a statement in the judgment of the court below to the effect that “The Defendant made a statement in the lower court only 1.6,50,000 won in total, including 1,60,000 won in the market price, and 1,50,000 won in total, i.e., 1,000 won in SGTV Monitoring, i., e., e., e., e., the victim F., the Do governor’s Da-gu Da 35 room operated by the Defendant F, and i.e., e., the Defendant’s e., the Defendant’s e., e., the Defendant’s e., the Defendant’s e., the Defendant’s e., the Defendant’s e., the Defendant’s e.