Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant at around 02:09 around August 14, 2015, at the room No. D5 located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 02:09, the Defendant “Woo-gu h. h. h. kbbbb h. h. kbbbb.”

Definites shall be discarded.

Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

“Along with the desire of the victim, the victim was fluored on the floor of the victim who was on his/her table, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (the details of voluntary accompanying, estimates for suspect's work, and photographs);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which is confined to a workhouse;

1. On August 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Defendant did not engage in a funeral service in a solitary manner on the ground that he did not do so for the victim in the studio No. D5 operated by the Young-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C victim F of the C victim F of the Dokjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City at around 02:09.

“Around 1650,000 won in total, the market value of which was 55,000,000 won or more of the 1,455,000,000 won or more of the 1,000,000,000 won or less of the market value, and 1,658,000 won in total of the 1,000,000,000 won or more of the market value

2. In a judgment, a judge can only recognize the facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial based on strict evidence that leads to such a conviction as to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

In a case where the prosecutor failed to prove sufficiently to the extent that the above convictions are to be ensured, even if the defendant's assertion or defense is contradictory or unreasonable, and there is a doubt of guilt, the judge shall make a judgment in the interest of the defendant.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is recognized that under the D 5 studio monitor operated by the victim F, any 5 LGTV monitor and any alcryle board, and one microphone is damaged.

The victim F and D employees E and G are the defendants in the court.