(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.04.03 2012고정237

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.04.03 2012고정237

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 28, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant expressed a desire to report the change of the location of the Defendant’s abboxe in front of the victim D (Inn, 65 years of age) located in Sincho-si C, and the Defendant expressed a blue that the victim would not take a bath, and that the victim would not take a bath was blue, when the victim’s chest was blue at least four times.

As a result, the defendant got a scarcity of a scarcity that requires treatment for about two weeks to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made by witnesses D and E in the second trial records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion is that the defendant did not injure or injure the victim.

2. The evidence and the records of this case, in particular, according to the consistent statements from the victim's investigative agency to this court and the witness E's statement supporting this, the defendant took a bath to see the victim's house, and she took a bath before her house, and she stated that E, which was around her house, was "drawing," and the defendant and E, had a verbal dispute between her and her victim, and there was no assault, such as drinking or drinking, but there was physical fighting in the process. However, the victim was a fighting with each other on the date of the dispute of this case. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant and the defendant suffered a second step on the booms of a chesthead wall at the F Hospital immediately after the dispute of this case, while the victim and the defendant were in dispute with the victim, there was no reason to recognize the defendant's chest and the defense counsel's injury as a part of the victim's body during the process of the dispute with the victim.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2014.12.18 2014고정2386

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.07.20 2015고정266

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.11.08 2013고정770

-광주지방법원 2014.12.16 2014고단2879

-의정부지방법원 2013.12.12 2013고단4014