logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.12.18 2015구합4882
운행정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of general trucking transport business, and is the business permission authority for each truck (A truck, B truck) listed in the attached Table.

C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) illegally created a general cargo model license plate and sold it.

C Around March 6, 2009, even though there was no purchase of a water tank for a special purpose-type tank, it prepares a false sales contract as if it purchased two motor vehicles for a special purpose-type tank (D vehicle E) and F vehicle (F vehicle number G). A public official in charge of the recruitment of the above illegal increase of a truck, who has recruited the above illegal increase of a 104 special-purpose truck, increased the 72 special-use truck for F vehicle, and increased the 72 special-use truck for F vehicle.

After that, C used a notice of the change in the permitted matters of trucking transport business (vehicle scrapping) to the forged trucking transport business (hereinafter referred to as the "written notification of the repair of the goods for large use") and borrowed a total of 176 of the number plates of the goods for special use (176 general truck number plates) as above, and registered the change.

The Plaintiff acquired two (H and I) of the number plates of general trucking vehicles illegally born from C, and accepted each report of transfer or acquisition of freight trucking services to the Defendant, and the Defendant accepted the report of transfer or acquisition of freight trucking services to the Defendant on May 26, 2009 (H) and October 14, 2009 (I).

(2) On July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed two trucks with the Plaintiff; and (b) “The instant truck is a special purpose-type truck (the tank live truck) and registered to be changed by borrowing and lending it to a general truck; and (c) the act of registering the change of the foregoing illegal increase of the number of trucks is prior to the amendment by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013; hereinafter “former Trucking Transport Business Act”).

The plaintiff is an act in violation of Article 3 (3), and the plaintiff is each of the above trucks.

arrow