logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단712
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 22, 1994, at around 12:49 on December 22, 1994, the Defendant, the owner of a truck A, who is his employee B, violated the restriction on operation by carrying a cargo of more than 11.1 ton of the freight on the 2 axis in excess of 10 ton of a livestock weight at the traffic control inspection room for the small and medium-sized motor vehicle located in the small and medium-sized Tool-Tool-

2. The judgment prosecutor applied Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); and the punishment of a fine of KRW 200,00 was finalized by a summary order subject to review but, in Article 86 of the same Act, “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article,” in Article 86 of the same Act, the portion that “if the agent, employee, or other employee of the corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow