logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.06.28 2013고단2032
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 6, 1994, at around 06:09 on August 6, 1994, the Defendant was the owner of a truck A, and around 06:09, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by carrying freight of 11.5 tons and 11.4 tons on the 2nd axis in excess of 10 tons of a stable weight in front of the business site of the Korea Highway Corporation, and operating the said vehicle.

2. The judgment prosecutor applied Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) to a public action, and the sentence of a fine of KRW 200,000 was finalized by a summary order No. 94 high-ranking1010, Nov. 7, 1994; however, in Article 86 of the above Act, the portion of "where an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the corresponding Article shall be imposed on the corporation," which is retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court decision No. 2011Hun-Ga24, Dec. 29, 2011.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow