logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고합70
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)교사
Text

[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months and fine for negligence of 30,000,000 won

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status Relation] Defendant A is the wife of the former YGun Z, Defendant B is a person who is in charge of the process of civil petition affairs of the YGun and the schedule management of the internal and external events of the YGun Gun, and Defendant C is a person who is in charge of the bid and contract affairs of the construction, such as waste disposal services ordered by the YGun YA as the director of the finance division of the YA YA.

[Attachment] From January 2008 to October 2013, YGun selected 417 cases of waste disposal services, including concrete generated from buildings, bridges, roads, etc., excluding designated wastes, through free contract or limited competitive bidding. From January 2008 to October 201, YGun concluded 385 contracts between AB and AC, a limited liability company and a limited liability company, a waste disposal business entity located in the previous North Korean AA operated by Defendant D.

Defendant

A, as above, around January 2013, Defendant D entered into a multiple waste treatment service contracts with the YGun Office, demanding AE to provide money and goods to “IE, 150 million won, if I want to open a coffee shop to me, it is necessary to do so,” while demanding AE to provide money and goods at the same time, and then continuously preparing the said money and goods on March 19, 2013, at the AH restaurant parking lot operated by Defendant A’s Dong resident AG located in AF around 19, 2013, a cashier’s checks of KRW 50 million from AE.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 2013, Defendant A, B, and C directed Defendant B to the effect that “IE will receive more money from the Defendant A in return for continuing to receive a large amount of waste disposal services from the YA because D had been subject to a large amount of waste disposal services at the YA.” The head of the finance division also sent the above purport to D and received the said content as D received from the head of the finance division.”

Defendant

C The defendant at that time.

arrow