1. The defendant Republic of Korea shall, on August 22, 1987, file with the plaintiff the Suwon District Court with regard to the land size B B 3,240 square meters.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The land of this case (hereinafter “the land of this case”) is located in Suwon-gun C (Seoul-gu, Suwon-si) with respect to the land of this case (hereinafter “the land of this case”) in 1940. (Fire 15 years)

3. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on April 9, 1940 on the ground of sale on April 20, 1940, and on January 19, 1942, the registration of change of indication as the title holder of ownership registration was completed in the name of F, the Japanese name of E.

B. However, as the old register concerning the instant land was transferred from the old register to the closed register, the name of the owner of the instant land was erroneously stated G.

C. The defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land of this case by the Suwon District Court, the Sungwon District Court, the Sungsung registry office, No. 28083 on August 22, 1987, on the ground of the reversion of rights on September 11, 1948, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to the defendant Gyeonggi-do as the receipt No. 39745 on December 31, 1993, on the ground of the exchange on December 31, 1993.

On July 20, 1961, H et al., a child of the E et al. jointly inherited the property, and H died on March 11, 1998, and the remaining Plaintiff et al. jointly inherited the property.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1-1~1-3, 2-1-2-3, and all pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the part of the claim against the defendant Republic of Korea, the previous owner of the land of this case recognized the fact that he was deceased I (one form F). The defendant Republic of Korea is deemed to have completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant Republic of Korea under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Act on the Disposal of Property Belonging, on the premise that the land of this case is attributed property, notwithstanding the fact that the land of this case is not attributed property under the Act on the Disposal of Property Belonging to Ownership. Thus, the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant Republic of Korea as to the land of this case is null and void without any