1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

1. The plaintiff filed a claim for damages based on a tort in the first instance court. The first instance court dismissed the part of the claim for inspection expenses for physical appraisal, and partly accepted the remaining claims.

As a result, only the defendant appealed against the part against the defendant, the part against the plaintiff shall be excluded from the scope of the adjudication of this court.

2. According to the evidence No. 1 and No. 3 of the Plaintiff’s damage liability, the Defendant: (a) around Sep. 27, 2017, the Plaintiff’s women’s family members, in front of the Yansan-gu C, Jeonsan-gu, Seoul, in which the Plaintiff suffered damage liability, “A,” written in the evidence No. 1 and No. 3,

Dr. Dr. D. P. L. L.

For the reason that “the Plaintiff’s face was blicked twice,” it is recognized that the Plaintiff’s face was blicked one time, followed the Plaintiff entering the drinking house, and the Plaintiff’s face was blicked up to the right side of the Plaintiff, which is a dangerous object, and the victim was injured by an injury, such as the mouth of the mouth, for about 49 days of treatment.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by tort.

3. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of damages, each relevant item of the table for calculating the amount of compensation for damage in the attached Form.

The period of the convenience of the calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be governed by the simple interest discount law that deducts the interim interest calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month.

A. With respect to the physical appraisal commission of the first instance court, the appraisal presented the result that the Defendant’s disability falls under class 9 of class 14 of the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act [Attachment 2] [Attachment 2], and the labor ability loss rate is presumed 5%. The above appraisal again leads to the 5 brain disorders damage in Section II-A-2 in relation to the two parts, brain, and dys.