logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.04.11 2015고정196
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2014, the defendant, upon the introduction of a branch of a person around 2014, provided the victim D with the introduction of the victim D, but came to be hedging thereafter, and had a good appraisal of the victim due to money problems that were in the course of teaching.

1. Interference with business or defamation;

A. On May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:14, at the 'F’ point operated by the injured party in Busan, Daegu, Busan, the Defendant: (b) provided that the injured party did not repay KRW 3 million from the Defendant; (c) provided that the injured party did not lend KRW 5:6,000,000 from the Defendant, the Defendant 5-6 of the above main customer with “Isnicks and Isnicks, if you do not do so.”

“The main agent G is not a victim and a person who is not a member of the victim, and even though the said main agent G is not a member of the victim, the said main agent was the victim of the disturbance that “D and a person who is a member of the Gu,” thereby avoiding the disturbance that “D and a person who is a member of the Gu,” thereby making the said main service customer leave.

B. On May 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:31 on May 21, 2014, at the places indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a); and (b) among many customers, the Defendant did not have access to the Defendant with the intention to acquire money from the beginning; (c) however, he/she shall be paid the Defendant with money to the Defendant.

Snick snicks, which are accused of fraud.

The term "resting the disturbance, etc." caused the disturbance to go to the customers of the above main office.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force, and at the same time, damaged the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Interference with duties and insult of the Defendant: (a) from around May 26, 2014 to around 03:00 of the following day, at the place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) the victim’s “hump to Chewing.”

I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am at night to reduce the million won.

The response will be enforced.

As we see that it is "," the main points were to escape from disturbance, so that the said main points were to go against.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force, and at the same time insultd the victim.

3. Obstruction of operations;

arrow