Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
420,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
피고인은 법률에 따라 당국의 허가 나 지정을 받은 마약류 취급자가 아님에도 불구하고 아래와 같이 마약류에 속하는 향 정신성의약품인 메트 암페타민 [Methamphetamine, 일명 ‘ 필로폰(ヒロポン, Philopon)’, 이하 ‘ 필로폰’ 이라 한다] 을 취급하였다.
1. On August 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 320,000 won from B to C’s D account (E) from B on the same day; (b) around 23:00 on October 31, 2018, B, who was indicted for the administration of phiphone, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years and probation observation for 10 months; and (c) around that time, the judgment became final and conclusive.
It issued approximately 0.35 g of philophones to sell philophones.
2. On October 13, 2018, the Defendant administered philophones in a way that scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon scopon spon
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Copy of each prosecutor’s protocol concerning the examination of suspect B;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (5,7) , seizure records and list of seizure records, appraisal records, and appraisal records;
1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of and Management of Narcotics, Etc. for Crimes ( punished by imprisonment)
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. The grounds for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. [the scope of the recommended punishment] / simply carrying a medication, etc., and the final scope of the sentence according to the aggravated punishment for multiple offenses (10 months to 2 years) in the basic area (10 months to 10 months) : 10 months to 3 years [the sentence] according to the sentencing guidelines, although the defendant did not have a criminal record exceeding the fine, it shall be taken into account the matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the defendant was in a relationship with B.