logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.01.17 2013가단26117
손해배상(자) 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 31, 2003, around 18:40 on March 31, 2003, Defendant D was faced with a network A (hereinafter “H-born woman,”) (hereinafter “the network”), which was coming from the Defendant’s vehicle, to park a G vehicle on the alleyway at the entrance of the Fhigh School located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

From March 31, 2003, which was the date of the instant accident, the deceased, under the name of brain dead in I Hospital, the parts with two copies, and the diagnosis of the brue base in I Hospital.

4. From Apr. 12, 2003 to Apr. 12, 2003 under the name of brain-dead, salvinal base, salvinal base, salvinal base, salvinal base, and pressure frame 3, both of which are the diagnosis of brain-dead, salvinal base and salv

5. Until 31. 49 days, K Hospital was hospitalized for 13 days from July 2, 2003 to 15.

C. The Deceased died on August 18, 2014. The Deceased’s heir was his/her spouse L, children M, and N in addition to the Plaintiff, who is his/her child, and L, M, and N did not return to Japan around 1973.

Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and fact-finding for the head of Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City

2. The plaintiff asserted that as the owner of the defendant vehicle as the operator D, the defendant company as the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is jointly liable for the property and mental damage suffered by the deceased due to the accident in this case, and therefore, the plaintiff is liable to pay damages to the plaintiff KRW 100 million and damages for delay after the accident in this case.

3. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the fact of recognition of liability, Defendant D as an operator of the Defendant vehicle, and the Defendant Company as an insurer who concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle, is jointly involved in the instant accident.

arrow