logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2015.10.27 2014가단8866
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who is engaged in the manology business in the name of “D”. The Defendants were married couple, and Defendant C operated the car page in the name of “F” in the name of “F” in the name of the Defendant B (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On October 26, 2012, Defendant B entered into a fire insurance contract with Samsung Fire Fighting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “insurance company”) with respect to all of the instant buildings, facilities, and house fixtures, the insurance period from October 26, 2012 to October 26, 2017; the amount of the insurance coverage (facilities and house fixtures) KRW 50 million; and the lessee’s liability for damages (hereinafter “instant insurance”).

C. On April 15, 2014, when a fire occurred in the instant building, the Defendants requested the Plaintiff to remove the instant building and construct the signboards of the first and third floors on the same day. After the removal and the construction of the said signboards, the Defendants requested the Plaintiff to perform the interior works of the instant building.

The Defendants delegated the instant insurance management to the accompanying damage adjustment company, and around April 22, 2014, the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and employees G of the said company stated only in the coffee shop near the instant building or the instant insurance payment.

On the same day, the Plaintiff sent a quotation (No. 8-2) with an internal repair work of KRW 60,66 million and an external repair work of KRW 15,20,00,000 to the above company. However, upon the request of another quotation from the above company, the Plaintiff re-issued a quotation with an internal repair work of KRW 96,910,00 and building work of KRW 29,050,00.

The above company submitted a written estimate to the insurance company to which the plaintiff sent again.

E. From April 23, 2014 to May 29, 2014, the Plaintiff continued to perform the interior repair work of the instant building (hereinafter “instant construction”).

F. Defendant B, from an insurance company on May 21, 2014, KRW 25 million as fire security (facilities and fixtures) and 22,700,00 as fire security (facilities and fixtures) on July 31, 2014.

arrow