logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.16 2014가단98418
손해배상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On the trade name of “B”, the Plaintiff engaged in the business of manufacturing electronic commerce (e.g., e., e-commerces, machine, printing machine, and printing machine (hereinafter “instant building”) from 645 and 646 (hereinafter “the instant building 645” and “the instant building 646”).

According to the classification of the contents of the building coverage, the amount of fire security (building) of KRW 1220,000,000,000 fire security (mechanic) of KRW 15,000,000,000,000,000 fire security (building) of the instant building, at the location of KRW 122,200,000,000,000 fire security (building) of KRW 646,000,000,000,000,000,000 as the fire security (building) of the instant building, at the location of KRW 15,000,000,000,000,000,000

B. On May 11, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded the following insurance contracts through D, an insurance solicitor belonging to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

C. On October 23, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased Nos. 531 and 532 of the instant building and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 8, 2013. On November 8, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a building management agreement on Nos. 531 and 532 of the instant building. On November 19, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for occupancy of the instant building Nos. 531 and 532 of the instant industrial complex at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

On December 26, 2013, the instant fire Nos. 531 and 532 of the instant building (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred, and the said fire caused the instant fire to be damaged, such as the Plaintiff’s forkeep, which was kept in custody.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence A1, 2, Evidence A4 through 6, Evidence A8, Evidence A11, Evidence A15, Evidence A16-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s primary cause of claim is the Plaintiff’s primary cause of claim: (a) the Plaintiff, around 2009, was a Chinese national residing in Korea from 2008, who acquired the Republic of Korea’s nationality; (b) but (c) the Republic of Korea’s building fire insurance was first subscribed.

. the defendant.

arrow