A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence 1 to 33 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of “2018 Highest 769”, along with B, C, D, etc., recommended, arranged, mediated, and mediated a mobile phone service contract on condition of the provision and melting of funds, using a mobile phone in the name of another person on condition of the provision and melting of funds, and providing a telecommunications service provided by a telecommunications business operator for the purpose of telecommunications by another person, etc. is strictly prohibited under the Telecommunications Business Act, and thus, a mobile communications business operator is also entitled to open many mobile phones in the name of a legal entity and receive separate subsidies (one-day rebates) from the mobile communications business operator in the event of opening, despite the fact that the mobile communications business operator does not permit it, the mobile communications business operator is able to open a mobile phone in the name of the legal entity, and open a high-priced mobile phone in the name of the applicant and open a mobile phone, and disposed of for export, etc. after removing the inner chip from the inner chips, and then, disposed of the remaining money after deducting the fee from the mobile phone operator.

The above 'Popon-on-line' business is a business which continues to claim a mobile phone fee including the price of a mobile phone, but those who wish to borrow the above mobile phone are not actually using the mobile phone, but merely pretending to use the mobile phone as if the nominal holders use the mobile phone normally, and it is nothing more than that of the above applicants to borrow a small amount of money through such 'Popon-line' program, and it is nothing more than that of the above applicants to borrow the mobile phone normally, but it is nothing more than that of the nominal holders to purchase and use the mobile phone normally.