logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단1631
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 7,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who actually operated the "E Co., Ltd." at a mobile phone sales store, and Defendant B is a person who has worked as the head of the above company.

The Defendants, in the name of a juristic person, can open a large number of cell phoness, and if opened, can receive a separate subsidy (one-time rebates) from the mobile communication company. The Defendants intended to invite loan applicants and open a mobile phone through the mobile phone, and then dispose of the mobile phone devices for export, etc. after removing the internal core chip, and then put the remainder of money obtained by deducting certain fees (five to 10 per cent per cent) from the disposal proceeds to loan applicants, and to carry on a "on-on-line chip chip chip chip chip chip" business in a way that generates a certain period of time by installing the core chip separated from the horse at another medium and on a device.

The above "prop-opener's business" refers to a person who has opened a mobile phone, including the price of a mobile phone, and although those who have opened the above mobile phone do not actually use the mobile phone, those who wish to borrow the mobile phone is merely pretending to use the mobile phone normally, and it is nothing more than that those who wish to borrow a small amount of money through such "prop-opener's own mobile phone" through the program of "Dak" by using the core chip removed as above. However, even if those who wish to use the mobile phone normally and normally, as if those who want to purchase and use the mobile phone and pay the mobile phone fee properly, they opened the mobile phone in the name of the above lending applicant, and then acquired it by receiving the mobile phone shorter and subsidy from the mobile communication company.

On January 4, 2014, the Defendants requested the above G to provide loans from the “H” office operated by G in Gwangju City F.

arrow