logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.01 2014고단302
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 16, 2004, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant’s employee B violated the restriction on the operation of roads exceeding 0.21m above the restriction standard by carrying a container of 4.21m high at the above vehicle at the inspection station at the location of the 12.5km point in the Seo-dong Highway Incheon Highway, Seodong Highway, Incheon.

2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Mar. 5, 1995; Act No. 12013, Nov. 28, 2013; Act No. 12214, Dec. 14, 2015; Act No. 12068, Mar. 16, 2014>

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow