Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, around July 2013, newly constructed a multi-family house on the Pyeongtaek-si D site (hereinafter “D site”), and was urged to pay KRW 110 million to the victim E, a subcontractor, due to the payment of the construction cost. On December 16, 2013, at the office of “ Han-si Law Firm Han-gu, a notary public,” which was located in Pyeongtaek-dong 151-8, from “Seoul-si, a notary public, shall pay KRW 110 million for the construction cost until December 31, 2013.” On the other hand, around September 24, 2013, A drafted a notarial deed with the content that “the notary public shall pay KRW 110 million for the construction cost” to the victim E, the victim F who was awarded a subcontract and the victim G who had been awarded a waterproof and waterproof construction work of the above multi-family house.

Defendant

A, due to the default of value-added tax on December 6, 2013, attached D site and buildings on the same ground from Silsi Office, and on December 31, 2013, A could be subject to compulsory execution against D site and buildings on the same ground from creditors, such as not paying the construction cost to victim E by December 31, 2013, and not paying the construction cost to victim F, and victim G, and Defendant B also accepted D site and buildings on the same ground for the purpose of evading this.

On March 19, 2014, the Defendants prepared a false sales contract as if they sold D site and its ground buildings to Defendant B from “I” operated by Defendant B in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by Defendant B, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Defendant B on March 19, 2014.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to transfer property to the victim E, victim F, and victim G with intent to escape from compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to J and F;

1. Application of the law to the certified copy of the register; and