logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.07.17 2014고단743
강제집행면탈
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 200, the Defendant purchased F loan A 302, 70,000,000 won, which is located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City E and one parcel, from the victim’s name with the victim’s D on September 8, 200, and completed the construction and registration of a building with respect to F loan C 101, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to the victim on April 30, 201, but paid KRW 73,00,000 as the housing price of C Dong 101 if it is not possible to undermine the registration of ownership transfer under C Dong 101 by April 30, 201.

However, as agreed, the Defendant was obligated to pay 36 million won to the victim the remainder after deducting the deposit and tax subrogated out of the house price of KRW 73,00,000,000, since the completion and registration of the Cdong 101 was completed and completed, and the registration of ownership transfer was not effected to the victim.

On December 16, 2010, the injured party filed a civil lawsuit against the accused and C on the basis of the above KRW 36 million claim with the Seoul Central District Court and received a favorable judgment that accepted the claim of the injured party for the above KRW 36 million claim on May 26, 201. On July 5, 2012, the appellate court dismissed all appeals by the accused and C, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

As above, the Defendant was in danger of compulsory execution due to the victim’s KRW 36 million’s claim, and on June 20, 2012, through G, a son in the Seoul Central District Court’s registry in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court, the Defendant transferred ownership registration in the first instance, which is the wife of G, through G.

However, in fact I did not purchase the shares of the above site from the defendant, and only lent only the name.

As a result, the defendant and G conspired to transfer property to the creditor in order to escape from compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning I;

1. Each police statement made to D or J;

1. Each judgment, a certified copy of real estate register, or a copy of application documents;

1. Records of civil procedure, such as records of pleadings;

arrow