beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 27, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on May 27, 2017: (a) around the fourth-day distance of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, created two new phone-to-phones in the name of Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) around May 27, 201, the Defendant would pay 50,000 won per one vehicle for the use of the latest phone-to-faces.
“.....”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to prevent the payment of the mechanical value and the user fee even if the victim received a cellular phone opened.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to open two parts of 99,900 Aphones (ipone 7) per 99,900 won on the same day, and received the delivery.
2. On May 30, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on May 30, 2017: (a) on the part of the victim, the Defendant created two up-to-date mobile phones in the Newdong-dong Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, to put up KRW 50,000 won on the victim’s cell phone value. However, on the other hand, the Defendant should create two up-to-date mobile phones in order to prevent the use of the machinery value and charges that have been created at the same time.
“.....”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to prevent the payment of the mechanical value and the user fee even if the victim received a cellular phone opened.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to open two parts of the phone (ipphone 7) per 1,152,800 won per day and then received the delivery.
3. On June 2, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime on June 2, 2017: (a) promised the victim to make a mobile phone more at the time near the Gu-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul to set up one mobile phone; (b) the victim’s mobile phone amounting to KRW 100,000,000, which was not paid at the last time; (c) the mechanical value and the fee did not vary; and (d) 50,000,000 won of the mobile phone value made at that time.
“.....”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to prevent the payment of the mechanical value and the user fee even if the victim received a cellular phone opened.
The defendant is the victim as above.