A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel 1731, the Defendant, “Around December 31, 2015, the victim D who became aware of the mobile phone opening in his/her name, shall not open the mobile phone opening in his/her name, and the value and the charge of the mobile phone opening in his/her name shall be borne by him/her within three months after the opening of the mobile phone.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a certain occupation, and there was no intention to pay the mobile phone machine value and charge from the beginning because there was no import.

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received two cellphones in the name of the victim from the victim at a mobile phone agency with no knowledge of the trade name located in the Seoul Tandong from the victim on December 31, 2015; (b) paid a total of KRW 1,869,880 in the machinery value and use fee; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by having the victim pay the same without paying the total of KRW 1,869,880 in the machinery value and use fee; and (d) received economic benefits or acquired economic benefits in total seven times from March 21, 2014 to February 13, 2016.

The Defendant of the 2016 Highest 1894, the Defendant, on April 24, 2014, shall not open a mobile phone in his/her name to the victim F who was aware of the fact from the LG Plus mobile phone agency located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on April 24, 2014.

If the mobile phone is opened in the name of thep, the machine value and the communication fee shall be borne by the internal government, and the change of the name will be made after one month.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant had no income from the absence of a certain occupation, and there was no intention or ability to pay the above expenses from the beginning because the Defendant had already opened two cell phoness in G name in the above way, but had not paid the machinery value and fees.

The defendant was opened from the victim's cell phone agency to the victim's name.