logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.15 2014나39359
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an insurance contract with the non-party company A (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party company") for the liability of compensation with the owner of the facility as shown in attached Form 1, and the defendant is a company that has concluded a contract for the repair of the elevator with the non-party company as shown in attached Form 2 with respect to the elevator installed at four points, including the non-party company B light name store (hereinafter referred

C (hereinafter “victim”) on June 5, 2010, around 14:16, 2010, on the part of Escopers 15 (hereinafter “instant Escopers”) installed in the instant building (hereinafter “instant Escopers”) and took the hand of his guardian’s knife from the fifth to the fourth floor of the fifth floor, and was laid down in the part of Dscoping the end of the Escopist, the victim’s knife came to go beyond the scope of the compact. At that time, the victim’s knife fell into the part of the Escopar. At the time, the victim’s knife’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn the left left part of the D.

(2) The Plaintiff paid KRW 22,00,000 to the victim of the instant accident (i.e., medical expenses of KRW 1,844,122; KRW 15,803; KRW 15,800; KRW 756,875,040; KRW 3,875,040; and according to the result of the instant damage adjustment, the non-party company paid KRW 22,00,000 to the victim on October 20, 201, by mutual agreement with the parent of the victim, the Plaintiff paid KRW 21,90,000,000 to the victim on the same day, excluding KRW 100,000,000.

[Grounds for recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, and the plaintiff's argument as to the ground of claim as to the whole purport of the pleadings was destroyed at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue. As a result of the investigation by the Committee for Determination of the Elevator Accident Investigation, the plaintiff's brooms of this case are broken.

arrow