beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Gohap 352"
1. On May 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00, the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City building; and (b) at the victim D’s house located in Dong 1:201, the victim-owned market value of KRW 200,000,000, which was located in the victim’s own house; (c) one cellphone PC in the market value of KRW 200,000,000; and (d) one lock in the market value of KRW 1.50,000,000.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.
2. On May 21, 2017, at around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) called “A” to the victim G, who was in the calculating team, in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu; (b) and (c) received from G a tobacco amounting to KRW 4,500, the market price of KRW 4,500; and (d) without paying the price; (b) made the victim H’s face 4,50, as a drinking to the victim H, who was the business owner of the above Su-gu; and (c) assaulted “A” on five occasions, for the purpose of evading arrest by putting the Defendant to the victim H, who was the business owner of the above Su-gu.
Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's property and assaulted the victim for the purpose of evading arrest.
"2017 Gohap 372"
1. Fraud;
A. On July 4, 2017, at around 13:20, the Defendant: (a) was provided with food at a “K” restaurant operated by the Victim J in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) even if not having any intent or ability to pay the price, the Defendant took the view that the Defendant would normally pay the price to the victim; and (c) ordered food, beverage, etc.; and (d) was provided with at least 15,00 won in total from the injured party, such as bones, dynapath, live, and 2 soldiers.
B. On July 2, 2017, around 23:50 on July 2, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime as if the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, etc. to the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim with the alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 24,000 in total of the market price from the victim, even though there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc.
2. The defendant who interferes with his duties is expected to drink food at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1 (a).