logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.06 2017고단5925
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the above punishment on October 26, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Fraud;

A. On July 21, 2017, around 21:00, the Defendant ordered alcohol and food from “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, as if the victim would pay the normal drinking value, etc.

However, the defendant did not intend to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol and food from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 44,00 won in total and 5 illness from the victim.

B. On July 24, 2017, around 00:00, the Defendant ordered alcohol and alcohol to pay the victim’s normal drinking value, etc. from the main point of “G” operated by the Victim F in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, as if the victim would pay the victim’s normal drinking value.

However, the defendant did not have an intention to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 33,00 won in total and 5 Macju by being provided with 33,000 won in the market price from the victim.

(c)

On November 5, 2017, around 19:50, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol as if the Defendant would pay the victim’s normal drinking value to the victim under the “J” main point operated by the victim I in Gwangju Northern-gu.

However, the defendant did not have an intention to pay the price even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired the victim's 50,000 won in total and the 1st week in the market price from the damaged person.

2. The defendant who interferes with his duties shall have a complaint on the calculation of the drinking value at the time, place, and the place specified in paragraph (3) of Article 1.

arrow