A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On June 7, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (ththie) in the original state support of the Chuncheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on March 21, 2010

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On January 11, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s home (Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Building 702) to the effect that “I will act as an agent on behalf of an owner of money.” The Defendant received KRW 1.5 million on the Internet-based website (C) of Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the false statement to the effect that “I would act as an agent on behalf of an owner of money,” and that I would make a payment of KRW 1.5 million on the phone, if I would act as an agent on behalf of the owner of the victim D who sawd the phone, six times on the same day.”

After that, around January 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Seoul's living standards to drive away from the passenger room in the "E" 'E' which is in the front room.

There is no prejudice against the disabled persons even if they are disabled persons.

I would like to enter into a marriage with a port where a debt has been repaid to the number of days.

"Along with the end of January 18, 2013, remittance of KRW 10,600,000 as corporate bonds repayment money was remitted on January 18, 2013, and from January 11, 2013 to January 18, 2013, the victim received property equivalent to KRW 13,021,640 in total from the victim or acquired property gains on eight occasions, as shown in the attached crime list.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any intention to act on behalf of the defendant or to marry with the victim, even if he received money from the victim and received money from the victim for a shortage of living expenses and pressure to repay bonds, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not intend to act on behalf of the defendant as the promise.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property worth KRW 13,021,640 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Details of passbook transactions, details of deposit and withdrawal transactions, details of payment for the use of Samsung Card, and statement of ordinary deposit transactions;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: