beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. On August 11, 1990, the Government Registry of the District Court with respect to the B ditch B, 89m2.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 10, 1913, the Gyeonggi Yang-gun-gun D 27 E was part of the said Yang-gun K on July 17, 1914, but the administrative district was changed around 1914 to the said E.
F with the address of the F, was considered respectively.
B. As the plaintiff's family supporting division, F, who was in the above Yangju-gun I, died on December 26, 1935 and succeeded to his/her own property, his/her father-Nam and family heir. The above J died on July 31, 195, and the plaintiff, his/her grandchild, succeeded to his/her property.
C. After that, following the change of land category and the change of administrative district, the said D land became B, B, 89 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Yangju-si, and the said G land became C, 423 square meters in forests and fields (hereinafter “instant land”) in Yangju-si.
As to the land No. 1, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of title No. 1”) as the receipt No. 31965 on August 11, 1990 by the Government Office of the District Court’s Office of Government, which received on August 11, 1990, and as to the land No. 2, the registration of preservation of title No. 15719 on March 22, 1996 by the same registry office (hereinafter “registration of preservation of title No. 2”).
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleading
2. Determination:
A. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the above facts acknowledged, the evidence employed prior thereto, the community service center of this court, and the entire purport of the arguments as to the Myeon Office of the Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, as a result of the fact-finding, are identical to F and one person’s name, which is the circumstances of the 1 and 2 land of this case. The legal domicile or domicile of the Plaintiff coincide with the above E, the death place of the Plaintiff’s father, the birth place of the Plaintiff’s father, and the Plaintiff’s birth place of the Plaintiff’s father at the time of the above circumstances, are not revealed.