1. The defendant on August 5, 1996, with respect to the land size of 506 square meters in the Dongbcheon-si B cemetery, Dongbcheon-si District Court.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Land assessment 1) The land survey division of Yangju-gun C (the name of the administrative district is changed to D) and E is the land survey division of Yangju-gun C (the name of the administrative district is changed to D). G with the address in Yangju-gun F on September 8, 1913 (the 2 years of Taeju-gun) 153 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

2) The nature name of the F in Yang-gun is “I, J,” and the nature name of the E in Yang-gun is “K, L, and M”.

B. 1) On October 26, 1925, P et al. inherited his/her property after death on October 26, 1925, and P et al. succeeded to his/her property. 2) On June 20, 1967, Q et al. inherited his/her property. Q et al died on October 19, 2007 and succeeded to his/her property by the Plaintiff et al.

3) At the time of the assessment of the instant land, there was no person having the same name as the Plaintiff’s fleet E. C. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation on August 5, 1996 on the instant land as indicated in the order (hereinafter “registration of ownership preservation”).

(ii) [In the absence of a dispute over the basis of recognition, entry of Gap 1 and 4 evidence, fact-finding results on the head of Songcheon-si, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. As shown in the above facts of recognition, G and the Plaintiff’s prior directors’ name are identical to that of G and the Plaintiff’s prior directors; F of Yangju-gun, the permanent domicile of the Plaintiff, and Yangju-gun, the permanent domicile of the Plaintiff, appears to be the same location; at the time of the instant land situation, both Yangju-gun, the Plaintiff’s prior domicile, and the Plaintiff’s prior domicile, are deemed to be the same. In full view of the fact that there was no Plaintiff’s prior domicile and Dong name, the circumstance of the instant land, G and the Plaintiff’

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s prior owner acquired the land of this case in its original condition, and the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the land according to his/her inheritance shares.

(b) A person registered in the land survey register as a landowner shall be the landowner unless there exists any counter-proof such as the change in the contents of circumstances by adjudication.