1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing it pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

3 at the bottom of the 10th judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

In other words, the Plaintiff’s payment of only the difference between the sale price and the sale price is for the convenience of settlement, and it is premised on the payment of the value of the shares in this case and the value of the unit sale apartment of this case. Thus, among the shares in this case, there was no transaction as to 7.81m2 corresponding to the site area of the

No compensation may be deemed to have been paid for this part.

At the bottom of the 11th judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

(1) The following is added to the judgment of the court of first instance, which held that the Plaintiff purchased the instant several apartment units, and that the Plaintiff did not receive any consideration before the registration of the instant apartment units was completed pursuant to the sales contract. Therefore, in the case of the registration of the instant trust, the payment for the instant outstanding shares was not completed at all) from 11 to 3 under the 11st page of the judgment of first instance.

In addition, in general, a contract to the effect that a landowner entrusts land to a real estate trust company, and a real estate trust company, as a trustee, performs an appropriate development act such as constructing a new building on the land trusted or creating a housing site, and then collects the input cost of a trust company from the revenue and delivers the proceeds to the beneficiary shall be considered as a trust contract under the Trust Act. Unless otherwise agreed, a contract shall be considered as a partnership contract between the landowner and the real estate trust company.