The defendant shall be innocent.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is the executive director of E Co., Ltd. in charge of aggregate construction in the “D development project in the wife population C” at the time of acceptance of the facts charged, who is responsible for the construction site.

Although anyone is prohibited from discharging designated wastes under the Waste Management Act in a public water zone, the Defendant neglected to manage the construction site on October 30, 2017, and caused the waste paint (designated wastes under the Waste Management Act) remaining after using it to work as an excellent pipe in the construction site on October 10, 2017.

2. According to the evidence submitted, the fact that the defendant was in charge of safety management at construction sites performed by the above company as the executive director of E company is recognized.

However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was in the position to direct and supervise the disposal of waste paints, etc. as a person in charge at the construction site, where the Defendant leaked waste paints at the construction site at the time of the time specified in the facts charged; or

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3. Conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, it is so decided as per Disposition by deciding not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.