(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.25 2017고단4408

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.25 2017고단4408

부정수표단속법위반

Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. From August 3, 1999, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the original name of Cho Jae-gu Bank and the Defendant, and traded household checks.

[2017 Highest 4408] On April 28, 2017, the Defendant issued one copy of a family check under the name of the Defendant, “E”, “5,000,000 won”, at the D’s place of business operated by the Defendant at the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

On September 28, 2017, the holder of the check presented the check to the above bank on September 28, 2017, which was within the period for presentation of payment, but did not pay the check upon termination of the check contract.

The defendant, in addition to this, is a list of annexed crimes.

1. As indicated in the statement, eight copies of household checks were issued in the name of the Defendant, and each holder of the checks presented payment within the period for presentation of payment, but each of the checks was not paid upon termination of the check contract.

[2018 Highest 565] On July 30, 2017, the Defendant issued one copy of the family check in the name of the Defendant, “F”, “F” on the date of issuance,” and “5,000,000 won” at the location of the D business place operated by the Defendant at the window C of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

On January 2, 2018, the holder of the check presented the check to the above bank on January 2, 2018, which was within the period for presentation of payment, but did not receive a suspension of transaction as of September 15, 2017.

In addition, the defendant is a list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. As indicated in the statement, a total of four pages of household checks (a total of KRW 20,00,000) were issued in the name of the Defendant, and each holder of the checks presented payment within the period for presentation, but all of them were not paid as suspension of transaction.

2. Determination and conclusion each of the above actions by the Defendant is an offense falling under Article 2(2) and Article 2(1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, and where a check is recovered pursuant to Article 2(4) of the same Act, a public prosecution may not be instituted.

According to the records, the defendant is the defendant of this case.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.10.02 2018고단283

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.01.18 2017고단2901

-의정부지방법원 2016.08.18 2016고단1765

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.08.10 2018고단1024

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.07.04 2017고단1275