logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고정432
상해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On May 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 10:30 on the street in the middle-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. and the victim E (n.e., the 55 years old) who prepares for opening the same type of business in the vicinity of the “Dlyng-gu, Ulsan-gu,” thereby disputing the opening of the business; (b) the Defendant was plicked by a hicker who listens to the victim’s desire to take care of the victim’s right hand; and (c) the Defendant inflicted an injury on the part of the victim, who is in need of approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment.

2. As evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, witness E, F’s prosecutorial and legal statement, G police’s statement, injury diagnosis statement, investigation report (the investigation report in the form of victim H counterpart statement), video data appraisal commission meeting, and psychological physiological examination result are notified.

In other words, E stated that the following circumstances, which can be seen by considering the evidence duly admitted by this court after considering the evidence, i.e., ① the defect of the article quality with the display stand, the defendant's loss that had been left under the display stand back to the display stand, and the witness F made a statement that E was sealed with two descendants due to the defect of the article quality due to the result of the defendant's loss, and the witness F made a statement that there was a difference between them; ② the witness F made the defendant's loss with two descendants, and did not pluck and pluck up the hand, but the defendant did not do so. ② The witness F made the defendant's loss with the second hand, and the defendant's loss was hard to inflict an injury on the right part of E (the fact that the defendant's loss was fasted with the second hand, and even if the defendant's loss was destroyed by the second hand, it is hard to inflict an injury on the remainder of the E that the defendant's loss suffered by the second hand.

arrow