All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to each punishment (defendant A, B, and each imprisonment of one year, confiscation and additional collection, Defendant C, and E, one year of suspended execution, two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, community service order, 80 hours of confiscation and additional collection, Defendant D, and F: 10 months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, observation of protection, 80 hours of community service order, confiscation and additional collection) are too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to have recognized the crime of this case and against the mistake, Defendant D did not have any history of criminal punishment for the last ten years except for the punishment of a fine of KRW 300,000 due to assault, and Defendant F did not have any history of criminal punishment until the criminal punishment until it has yet to be imposed, and Defendant C, D, E, and F contributed money to the public interest organization in the first instance.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendants, without registering with the competent authorities, by introducing female contact loans to entertainment establishments, providing them with free-registered job placement services, and arranging commercial sex acts. Such crime was committed with considerable social harm, such as undermining the sound sex culture and good morals, and constitutes Q, etc., the defendants committed the crime of this case systematically, and the defendant's contact loans belonging to the above Q constituted " Q". The number of times the defendants arranged commercial sex acts during the crime of this case by arranging commercial sex acts of this case, and the number of times the defendants arranged commercial sex acts during the crime of this case reaches 1,00 times in total, is not very good in terms of the means, methods, and scale of the crime of this case. The crimes of this case are deemed to have been committed by the defendants to have obtained profits relatively little, and the crimes of this case were committed with imprisonment for the attempted crime of this case, and the repeated crime of this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution. The defendants B was sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime of this case.