logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.11.28 2014노3675
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반등
Text

All the judgment below is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and by a fine of five thousand won.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for 8 months, additional collection of 586,00 won, Defendant B: fine of 10 million won, additional collection of 1.8 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendants' act of purchasing, selling, etc. a motor vehicle without the registration of the motor vehicle management business, such as the crime of violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act committed by the defendant A, does not have a number of times the defendants arranged to engage in commercial sex acts for a period of 97 months, and the quality of such crime is not good, and the act of purchasing, selling, etc. a motor vehicle without the registration of the motor vehicle management business, as well as the act of purchasing, selling, etc. a motor vehicle without the registration of the motor vehicle management business, is likely to lead to mass production of many victims by abusing it as a means of crime or tax evasion, etc.

However, the defendants led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant A reflects his mistake through a prison life for about five months, there is no criminal conviction against the defendants, and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine in the case of the defendant A, each of the crimes of this case seems to be relatively large in profits acquired by the defendants due to the crimes of this case, and in the case of the defendant B, the degree of participation in the crime of this case is somewhat weak in view of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime of this case, means and method of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendants is with merit.

3. Thus, the defendants' appeal is justified.

arrow