1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The facts under the recognition of facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings, based on the results of the fact inquiry with respect to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 25 (including the number of each branch number), and the results of the request for the examination of the medical records with respect to the director of the race hospital at the first instance court, the director of the race hospital at the second instance court, and the director of the happiness hospital at the high university, the results of the request for the examination of the medical records by the first instance court on June 8, 2016, and the purport of the entire arguments.

C Hospital’s treatment 1) The Defendant is a medical corporation that operates C Hospital in the area of Busan Northern-gu G (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) On July 2, 2009, the Plaintiff was provided medical treatment from a medical specialist outside the prison due to the pain, etc. of the right sprinked by the Defendant Hospital.

3) D diagnosed the Plaintiff’s pain by treating the Plaintiff’s pain with the chrops and tensions on the right edge, and prescribing the Plaintiff’s pharmacologic and physical therapy from around that time to October 15, 2009, and the Plaintiff’s symptoms were not improved. 4) On July 2, 2009, at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital, the part protruding out to the front right edge of the X-ray’s inspection conducted against the Plaintiff was confirmed, and the doctor diagnosed the Plaintiff with the certificate of a collision-componant.

5) Defendant Hospital’s inspection conducted on October 6, 2009 with respect to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

In the following symptoms, the symptoms were confirmed. The outer side of the upper frame and the upper frame are stimulated, and the adjacent annual organization is not large. - There is a possibility of the anti-former collision Earsenalist. The cost of the front frame is accompanied by the decrease of signal. - chronic damage or instability: chronic damage or unstableness. 6) D requested a medical specialist E in charge of the operation and cooperation with the Plaintiff at the Defendant hospital.

7 E is against the plaintiff.