logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2014.05.15 2014고정15
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a B-hand vehicle.

On January 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 20:10, and proceeded the two-lane prior to the Korean Vessel located in the New-dong of Busan, Seoyeong-gu, Busan, into a river from the boundary of the Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Korean Steel Station, and changed the course to the one-lane.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by changing the vehicle line in the manner that the driver of the motor vehicle operates the direction, etc. in advance and pre-announces the change of course and well-being the traffic situation of the front and rear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to change the lane to the left-hand side, thereby resulting in the victim C (the 44 years of age) driving at a one-lane, and was sapved behind the right-hand side of the DA5-si operated by the victim C (the 44 years of age).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement) was accompanied by a traffic survey office of the Busan Fari Police Station, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking and smelling at the Defendant’s entrance from a slope F of the Busan Fari Police Station, which was called out after having been reported 112 due to a traffic accident at the above time and at the above place.

피고인은 같은 날 20:40경 위 사무실에서 경장 G으로부터 약 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정에 응하지 아니 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A traffic accident investigation report, a taxi boom photograph, and an accident vehicle.

arrow