1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to that part is dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was admitted to Seongdong-gu dental station managed by the Defendant from July 11, 2013 to December 29 of the same year.

B. The Plaintiff’s assault damage (1) B was detained by the obstruction of business on July 25, 2013, and was detained in Seongdong-gu (hereinafter “instant ward”). On the 26th day of the same month, the Plaintiff was transferred to 7 rooms (living rooms for unconvicted prisoners, such as property offenders, and hereinafter “instant ward”).

(2) On July 27, 2013, E, a prisoner of the instant ward, said that he was smelled in his body on July 27, 2013, but B did not seem to have any reaction.

E had the plaintiff end up with the cleaning agent B.

The plaintiff said that the plaintiff was a cleaning agent by carrying a hand received from Eul.

B assaulted on the part of the Plaintiff’s left side and on the part of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant assault”). C.

(1) The Plaintiff complained of the instant assault on July 29, 2013, and was treated by a medical officer in charge of a detention house on July 29, 2013.

The plaintiff stated that the plaintiff has a clothes, the plaintiff gets out of the urine, and left home.

The plaintiff's blood urology was confirmed to stop, and there was no more than anything although he observed the dead body.

(2) On July 31, 2013, the Plaintiff appealed that ear’s pain continued to exist, and was prescribed by the Director of the Detention House.

(3) On August 5, 2013, the Plaintiff requested a medical officer in the detention center to have him/her go home to receive a leave of absence.

(4) On August 12, 2013, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from “DBD”.

The Plaintiff complained of the degradation and ear-gu.

The doctor in charge provided a diagnosis that it is necessary to treat a superior hospital in order to ascertain the cause, because there is no more than the intention of the doctor in charge, but the hearing ability of the left side has deteriorated.

(5) The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Gyeong University Hospital from August 19, 2013 to August 23, 2013 and received medical treatment.

The doctor in charge shall diagnose the plaintiff as a spathic dyslexism, and "the cause of the spathic e.g. by another person."