A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Presumptions] The Defendant is between the victim C (V, 39 years of age) and the married couple.

On January 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) agreed with the victim on a case in which he/she was dissatisfied with the victim on the kitchen knife; and (b) agreed with the victim on the case that “to die and die,” and received a disposition of transfer of home protection cases; and (c) received ad hoc measures on February 11, 2016 from the Daegu Family Court resident support for domestic violence under paragraph (1) of the following criminal facts to order temporary measures, such as prohibiting access to the victim’s residence and place of work.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 10, 2016, the Defendant, at the time of stay at the seat of a new wall, engaged in bullying to prevent the victim and his/her dependants from getting out of the ward of the Defendant located in D without any particular reason. The victim, who escaped from the police due to the defect of the police report, returned to the police, and returned to the police.

At around 11:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s desire to take care of the victim, who reported to the police as above; (b) brought the victim’s desire to take care of his or her his or her body together with his or her wife; (c) brought about the transition (22cm in total length, 11cm in length in length) which is a dangerous object in the kitchen where the victim attempted to take care of his or her body with his or her wife; and (d) brought the victim’s desire to die with his or her body on his or her left arms.

“The above excessive restriction cited in the lush hand was turned on, and the victim’s head was the same as the victim’s head.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous article in excess of the victim's right to use it.

2. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant made a telephone call to the victim at the end of the victim’s working office in E at around 15:40 on February 13, 2016 at around 15:40, while making a telephone call to the victim.

It is called "the inside of the police", and it is different for the police to arrive in front of the above office by reporting the frighten to the police.