A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2017, in front of the main point of “C” located at Ansan-si B, Anyang-si, around 02:05, the Defendant respondeded to the Defendant’s notification from the victim E, who is a police official belonging to the police station D police unit, to the charge of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and committed assault against the victim on several occasions due to the Defendant’s two fingers, shoulders, fels, and felgs, etc., while taking the bath theory that the said victim would have to board the police vehicle, thereby preventing the victim from having any defect in the police vehicle, and doing so.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the dispatch of 112 reported police officers due to violence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (fe.g., interference with performance of official duties or coercion of duties) - No person subject to special sentencing (fe., June 1 to June) shall be considered as having any history of being sentenced to a fine on three occasions before 194 for another type of crime.