1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1 and the entire purport of the pleadings:

On October 17, 2014, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant a supply and demand of KRW 50,000,000 (excluding value-added tax, KRW 30,000,000 when entering into a contract, and KRW 20,000,000 when entering into a contract) for the design business remodeling construction for the business facilities in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Defendant, for two months from the date of entering into a contract for the service period.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant design service”). B.

On October 21, 2014, the Defendant paid KRW 33,000,000 to the Plaintiff as the price for the instant design service.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 20,00,000, out of the remainder of the design service cost in the instant design service contract to the Plaintiff at the time of delivery of the execution design documents. Since the Plaintiff supplied all the execution design documents on March 24, 2015, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 20,00,00,00. The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the design cost. 2) In full view of the Plaintiff’s statement of Gap’s No. 1, 2, Eul’s No. 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, and 6, witness witness’s partial testimony and arguments, the Defendant sent the original design service at issue to D who is a professor of the E University spatial Survey and Design Research Center, 2, 3,000,000,000 in the instant design service contract at issue, 3,000,0000 in the design service contract at issue between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as a professor of E University, 2, and 4, the design proposal in the instant design service contract at first 2.