logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.11.28 2018고정849
결혼중개업의관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 High Court Decision 2017Da849] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the international marriage brokerage business under the trade name of “A” corporation in Seo-gu Daejeon.

If an international marriage broker obtains certification from a user who has entered into a contract and from the other party to marriage brokerage and provides all of the users with written consent to marriage brokerage in writing after obtaining certification from a notary public of each country concerned, such as marriage history, health status, occupation, etc., the international marriage broker shall arrange for remainder and shall not introduce at least two other parties to the user at the same time.

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant introduced 40 persons, including Vietnam Women F, in a state where the Defendant did not provide personal information to users E in writing, to E, in an influent room of the D hotel located in Vietnam Minh City on December 1, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant did not fulfill his duty to provide personal information and introduced two or more other parties to the user at the same time.

[2] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the international marriage brokerage business under the trade name of “stock company C” in Seo-gu, Daejeon.

An international marriage broker shall obtain personal information, such as marriage history, health status, occupation, etc. from a user who has entered into a contract and the other party to marriage brokerage and obtain certification from a notary public of each country concerned, and provide the other party to marriage brokerage and

On September 28, 2017, the Defendant introduced a non-state female under the condition that the Defendant did not provide the user G with the certified personal information from a notary public of the pertinent country at a large retailer cock in Thailand.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 High Court Decision 849]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Transaction records of deposits, full certificates of registered matters, personal entry and departure status (E);

arrow