A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

. It has confirmed that the ship is underwater;

The defendant notified that he is a victim, and attempted to arrest the defendant. "I am to do so. I am to do so."

“In doing so, at the same time, the victim resisted the chest of the victim, bucks, bucks, etc., and the victim tried to arrest the victim by using the lock, she broken down the victim’s left side bucks as soon as possible with the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the arrest of designated winners, and at the same time, caused the left buckbucks where the victim cannot know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Concurrent crimes, and the punishment shall be imposed as heavy injury);

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (The consideration of favorable sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for protection observation and attendance order * The crime of this case is not subject to the sentencing criteria in principle for crimes falling under the ordinary competition, but refers to the case of obstructing the performance of official duties, which is a special aggravated (6 months to 2 years) in the aggravated area (6 months to 6 years), among the sentencing criteria for the crime of injury.

* The above circumstances and uniform police officers found the Defendant to be the person nominated by the Defendant and committed the act of attacking the police officer in order to perform official duties. However, there is no record of punishment heavier than the fine, and the Defendant appears to have been detained for a considerable period of time, and the opportunity to reflect the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, and circumstances after the crime are determined as ordered by the order.