logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.17 2015고단2237
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for up to seven months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2008, the Defendant, on February 5, 2008, made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would sell an apartment that is owned by the owner of the victim D in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Busan-si, and that “the victim D will immediately repay the apartment by selling the apartment that is owned by the owner of the victim D, who was in his/her possession in his/her possession, with the traffic accident agreement in the event of an accident.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not own apartment and did not own any property, and even if he borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it within a short time.

On February 11, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 10 million won from the above beauty service room from the victim and acquired it by deception.

2. On February 26, 2008, the Defendant, on the part of the Police Officer No. 1, 2008, made a false statement to the effect that “If the above victim is unable to acquire a company that carries out road packing construction, it would be paid back as he sells the apartment if the apartment is not sold, and if the apartment is not sold, the apartment would be sold first.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money as stated in paragraph (1), he did not have any intention or ability to repay it within a short time.

On February 26, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 10 million won from the above beauty service room from the victim and acquired it by deception.

3. On April 10, 2008, the Defendant, at the beauty art room as indicated in paragraph (1) of Apr. 10, 2008, made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, who committed the crime of fraud, borrowed the above victim KRW 7.5 million more than the purchase price due to the shortage of materials, and would receive the loan as security even if the apartment is not sold.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money as stated in paragraph (1), he did not have any intention or ability to repay it within a short time.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.

arrow