The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of imprisonment (one year and two months, confiscation and collection) imposed by the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case.

However, from around 197, the Defendant had been punished four times for the same kind of crime by putting her hand on narcotics (which means three times of the previous convictions), and in particular, within three years after being sentenced to imprisonment on December 12, 2014 and released on November 18, 2015, the Defendant committed the instant crime and constitutes a repeated offense.

In addition, the quantity of a penphone possessed by one defendant is not less than 3.11g, and the act of providing a penphone to another person without compensation is more likely to be criticized than the simple administration or possession of a penphone.

In addition, considering the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, and past conviction, the sentence sentenced by the court below is not heavier.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.