The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of imprisonment (one year and two months, confiscation and collection) imposed by the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is the confession of the crime of this case, and the mere two times of medication may be considered as the sentencing data favorable to the defendant.

However, from around 1996, the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime by her hand with narcotics more than 12 times (the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on February 16, 2006 and August 14, 2007). In particular, on June 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime on June 20, 2014 and was released on February 2, 2016, and is expected to have a great dependence on the Defendant’s narcotics in light of the maternity appraisal result, and the Defendant’s age, sex, and environment, and the sentence imposed by the lower court is not heavy.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.