logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.12.13 2017구합103220
부당징계구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) following the decision on reexamination was a person who first joined the Ansan Agricultural Cooperative on November 11, 1996 and served in the Daenam Agricultural Cooperative newly established by the merger between the Annam Agricultural Cooperative and the Anng National Agricultural Cooperative on January 17, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul National Agricultural Cooperative”), and worked for the Plaintiff individually transferred to the Plaintiff on March 1, 2014. A loss, etc. caused by high-priced appraisal is a person who incurred losses, etc.

A. As a result of the self-evaluation conducted on August 21, 2013 to lend 250,000 won to the debtor's detached houses and land (Yongcheon-gun D) as collateral - under the name of contributing to the partnership - as a result of the appraisal by applying the unit price for construction of a building, which is a general house, to a de facto high-class house without objective data, a legitimate appraisal was appraised as 598,05,000 won exceeding KRW 92,874,000,000 (based on the first legal company) compared to 505,1874,000 won. - on August 23, 2013, the amount available for the loan 186,626,000 won exceeded 63,374,000 won, 250,000 won, and after loan - the amount of loan - the amount of loan - the amount of loan - the association's liability for non-performance loss 164,57,57,74,500.

B. On April 27, 2007, the intervenor B, who is responsible for dealing with unfair credit-free loans, handled KRW 13,000,000 in the debtor E’s non-guaranteed credit loan loan without any relevant documentary evidence, offered loans by unfairly inputting the vocational evaluation criteria into KRW 13,50,000 in ginseng cultivation and wage of KRW 80,000 in earned income without any relevant documentary evidence; and on July 29, 2013, the debtor F’s non-guaranteed credit loan of KRW 7,000 in KRW 7,000 without any legitimate documentary evidence and without any relevant documentary evidence, entered KRW 24,000 in the withholding receipt based on the amount of income from the withholding received. - The debtor’s repayment ability is lost thereafter.

arrow