1. The Defendants are either KRW 160,000,000 for each Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from September 3, 2013 to the date of full payment.

. The average of 90,000,000 Da 3010,000,000 average of 195,000,000,000 of 301,000,000 of 301,000,000 of 301,000,000 of 195,000,000,000 of 195,0000,000,000 of 195,000,000 of 1,000,000 of 1,000,000 of 2,000,000 of 1,000,000 of 1,000,000 of 3,000,000,000 of 2,000,000 of 9,000,00 of 1,0000,00

C. Defendant B, by having the instant obligor visit the Plaintiff’s office directly, confirmed the documents related to the loan application and signed and sealed on his own pen, and requested the Plaintiff to submit acquisition tax statement and receipt regarding each secured real estate in order to verify the actual transaction price. Defendant B modified the payment statement of acquisition tax and receipt, the tax base amount of the receipt, and the tax amount amount that are written on the basis of an amount lower than the transaction amount on the sales contract, so that they can coincide with the transaction amount on

The Plaintiff did not recover the total amount of KRW 543,018,556,000,000,000,000 from the loanable amount calculated based on the actual tax base amount as follows (hereinafter “instant loan”).

The actual acquisition tax on the loan date of the debtor.